<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Three Bears of Social Media Marketing: Part 1 (Mama Bear)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.remarkable-communication.com/the-three-bears-of-social-media-marketing-part-1-mama-bear/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.remarkable-communication.com/the-three-bears-of-social-media-marketing-part-1-mama-bear/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 05 Mar 2010 15:00:20 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Heidi Strom Moon</title>
		<link>http://www.remarkable-communication.com/the-three-bears-of-social-media-marketing-part-1-mama-bear/comment-page-1/#comment-175</link>
		<dc:creator>Heidi Strom Moon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Jun 2008 09:36:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.remarkable-communication.com/the-three-bears-of-social-media-marketing-part-1-mama-bear/#comment-175</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Another company for which social/conversational marketing is a good fit is Zappo&#039;s. They have several blogs on their site and so many of their employees Twitter -- perhaps none more so than the CEO -- that they have an entire page for those users (http://twitter.zappos.com/).&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;But again, like Southwest, this was a company that already had a reputation for customer service and communication, so using new forms for that communication to customers is just an extension of corporate identity.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Looking forward to the Papa Bear model because that also has importance, particularly for companies&#039; reputation management.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Another company for which social/conversational marketing is a good fit is Zappo&#8217;s. They have several blogs on their site and so many of their employees Twitter &#8212; perhaps none more so than the CEO &#8212; that they have an entire page for those users (<a href="http://twitter.zappos.com/)" rel="nofollow">http://twitter.zappos.com/)</a>.</p>
<p>But again, like Southwest, this was a company that already had a reputation for customer service and communication, so using new forms for that communication to customers is just an extension of corporate identity.</p>
<p>Looking forward to the Papa Bear model because that also has importance, particularly for companies&#8217; reputation management.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Martine &#124; Remarkablogger</title>
		<link>http://www.remarkable-communication.com/the-three-bears-of-social-media-marketing-part-1-mama-bear/comment-page-1/#comment-174</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Martine &#124; Remarkablogger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jun 2008 08:14:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.remarkable-communication.com/the-three-bears-of-social-media-marketing-part-1-mama-bear/#comment-174</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Love the bear thing. I took the red pill a long time ago, and the cluetrain continues to roll on, unstoppable.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I really like what you&#039;re saying about those who do not actively participate in the conversation. It&#039;s absolutely true. Most people will never comment on a blog. Compared to the general population, very few people engage in social media. It is still pretty much a thing for the tech elite. And there&#039;s nothing wrong with that, because if you&#039;re selling something, those people have money. &lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Love the bear thing. I took the red pill a long time ago, and the cluetrain continues to roll on, unstoppable.</p>
<p>I really like what you&#8217;re saying about those who do not actively participate in the conversation. It&#8217;s absolutely true. Most people will never comment on a blog. Compared to the general population, very few people engage in social media. It is still pretty much a thing for the tech elite. And there&#8217;s nothing wrong with that, because if you&#8217;re selling something, those people have money. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sonia Simone</title>
		<link>http://www.remarkable-communication.com/the-three-bears-of-social-media-marketing-part-1-mama-bear/comment-page-1/#comment-173</link>
		<dc:creator>Sonia Simone</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Jun 2008 11:40:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.remarkable-communication.com/the-three-bears-of-social-media-marketing-part-1-mama-bear/#comment-173</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Evan, my guess is you won&#039;t like Papa Bear at all. :) &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I think that&#039;s very smart, James. There&#039;s more room than people think to use these tools in a fairly traditional context.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Evan, my guess is you won&#8217;t like Papa Bear at all. <img src='http://www.remarkable-communication.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />  </p>
<p>I think that&#8217;s very smart, James. There&#8217;s more room than people think to use these tools in a fairly traditional context.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Janice C Cartier</title>
		<link>http://www.remarkable-communication.com/the-three-bears-of-social-media-marketing-part-1-mama-bear/comment-page-1/#comment-172</link>
		<dc:creator>Janice C Cartier</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Jun 2008 11:27:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.remarkable-communication.com/the-three-bears-of-social-media-marketing-part-1-mama-bear/#comment-172</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt; Ooh,  Goldilocks here. Cannot wait for Papa and Baby Bears because we are looking for just right. What a great analogy. &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;It&#039;s the blend and the balance. Not one or the other , IMHO.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> Ooh,  Goldilocks here. Cannot wait for Papa and Baby Bears because we are looking for just right. What a great analogy. </p>
<p>It&#8217;s the blend and the balance. Not one or the other , IMHO.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Evan</title>
		<link>http://www.remarkable-communication.com/the-three-bears-of-social-media-marketing-part-1-mama-bear/comment-page-1/#comment-171</link>
		<dc:creator>Evan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Jun 2008 16:40:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.remarkable-communication.com/the-three-bears-of-social-media-marketing-part-1-mama-bear/#comment-171</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Thanks Sonia.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;An excellent analysis.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I&#039;ve stumbled it - just in case you believe in socail media.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;It sounds like Baby Bear will be the one for me.  Looking forward to it.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Sonia.</p>
<p>An excellent analysis.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve stumbled it &#8211; just in case you believe in socail media.</p>
<p>It sounds like Baby Bear will be the one for me.  Looking forward to it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James Hipkin</title>
		<link>http://www.remarkable-communication.com/the-three-bears-of-social-media-marketing-part-1-mama-bear/comment-page-1/#comment-170</link>
		<dc:creator>James Hipkin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Jun 2008 14:34:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.remarkable-communication.com/the-three-bears-of-social-media-marketing-part-1-mama-bear/#comment-170</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Conversation may be a spectator sport for most but even those who are watching are probably best customers / heavy users of the category or they wouldn&#039;t bother.  Heavy users have the power to move your business.  A small shift in loyalty can have a significant impact, either positive or negative.  Just attempting a conversation, of demonstrating you are interested in their opinion and responsive to opinions when given, has a significant impact on behavior.  So I believe that keeping conversation available in the tactical arsenal is important.  It doesn&#039;t replace current tactics but, when it&#039;s feasible, include it in the mix.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Conversation may be a spectator sport for most but even those who are watching are probably best customers / heavy users of the category or they wouldn&#8217;t bother.  Heavy users have the power to move your business.  A small shift in loyalty can have a significant impact, either positive or negative.  Just attempting a conversation, of demonstrating you are interested in their opinion and responsive to opinions when given, has a significant impact on behavior.  So I believe that keeping conversation available in the tactical arsenal is important.  It doesn&#8217;t replace current tactics but, when it&#8217;s feasible, include it in the mix.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
